![]() These tanks are effective at withstanding bullets, but not much else! Of course, the Russian army had originally planned to acquire 2,300 T-14s – the next generation Armata tank - between 20, but reliability and production issues have meant only a handful are available, and to date they have not made any impression on the battlefield.Īgainst this backdrop, the West agreed to provide a selection of modern tanks from its reserves to help Ukraine with its offensive. Having lost over 2,000 of its frontline tank capability, Russia was obliged to raid supplies of older Second World War vintage tanks to support the frontline. Indeed, at one stage the Ukrainians advised the biggest external provider of military equipment to Ukraine was Russia! However, the West responded by providing an array of anti-tank weapons that proved very effective at destroying a significant proportion of available Russian T-72 and T-64 tanks – many of which were abandoned on the battlefields and later recovered and repaired by Ukrainian forces. However, following the recent reports about the first loss of a Challenger II battle tank, I will do my best to provide some context.Īt the start of the war, Russia used its inventory of modern (ish) tanks to push Ukraine's defensive forces back in the early phases of the Russian offensive. Before getting into the meat of it, I should point out that Ukraine does not provide a running commentary about progress in the war and is very reluctant to discuss how specific items of military equipment are faring. Military analyst Sean Bell had this to say. Today, Regae3 asks why there are no reports on how the allied supplied tanks are doing in the war in Ukraine. We've been putting your questions to our experts and senior correspondents.Įvery weekday at lunchtime, they've been providing their specialist insight into the biggest issues raised by readers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |